| 492 | 26 | 52 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为研究酸法和CO2地浸采铀对地下水的影响,对新疆伊犁盆地的酸法和CO2地浸采区的地下水水质进行采样分析。结果表明,酸法地浸开采时地下水中绝大部分组分含量均明显高于地下水本底值和国家地下水Ⅲ类质量标准,总矿化度超过国家地下水Ⅲ类标准11倍左右,超标的组份主要有硫酸根、锰、镍、铁、铅、锌、镉、砷等重金属元素和钍等放射性元素。CO2地浸对地下水各个组分浓度影响要小得多,pH基本不变,总矿化度高出国家地下水Ⅲ类质量标准2.6倍左右,地下水中主要的污染因子为硫酸根离子、硝酸根离子、氯离子、锰离子和镍离子,而铜、锌、镉、铅、铁、砷等其它组分浓度未发生显著变化。酸法采区中的单项污染指数依次为Fe>Mn>Ni>Pb>SO42->Zn>As>Cd,CO2采区中单项污染指数依次为NO3~->Mn>Ni>SO42->Cl~-。酸法采区地下水综合污染指数比CO2采区高3～384倍。污染物主要来源于人为注入的化学试剂和含矿层中矿物反应释放的组分,两种地浸方法由于加入的溶浸剂不同导致地下水的地球化学环境和污染特征存在显著差异。
Abstract：In order to study influence of acid leaching and CO2 in-situ leaching on groundwater,quality of groundwater in Yili basin of Xinjiang was sampled and analyzed.The results show that the vast majority of component contents in groundwater is significantly higher than background value and the national quality standard of classⅢfor groundwater in acid leaching.Total salinity is about 11times higher than the national standard for classⅢgroundwater.The above-standard components are sulfate,manganese,nickel,iron,lead,zinc,cadmium,arsenic and other heavy metals and radioactive elements.CO2 in-situ leaching has a much smaller effect on concentration of various components of groundwater,pH value is basically unchanged,and total salinity is about 2.6 times higher than the national quality standard of classⅢfor groundwater.The main pollution factors in groundwater are sulfate,nitrate,chloride,manganese and nickel,while copper,zinc,cadmium,lead,iron,arsenic and other components concentration does not change significantly during CO2 in-situ leaching.Single pollution index in acid mining area is Fe>Mn>Ni>Pb>SO42->Zn>As>Cd,and single pollution index in CO2 mining area is NO3~->Mn>Ni>SO42->Cl~-.Comprehensive pollution index of groundwater in acid mining area is 3-384times higher than that in CO2 mining area.Pollutants mainly come from artificially injected chemical reagents and components released by mineral reaction in ore-bearing layer.Geochemical environment and pollution characteristics of groundwater in the two in-situ leaching methods are significantly different due to different leaching agents.
[1]SEREDKIN M,ZABOLOTSKY A,JEFFRESS G.In situ recovery,an alternative to conventional methods of mining:Exploration,resource estimation,environmental issues,project evaluation and economics[J].Ore Geology Reviews,2016,79:500-514．
[2]WAGRAMER S.Guidebook on Environmental Impact Assessment for In-Situ Leach Mining Projects[M]IAEA.IAEA-TECDOC-1428,Viena(Austria),2005．
[3]IAE.Regulatory Control of Radioactive Discharges to the Environment[M]IAEA.Safety Guide No.WS-G-2.3,Viena(Austria),2000．
[4]IAE.Manual of Acid In-Situ Leach Uranium Mining Technology[M]IAEA.IAEA-TECDOC-1239,Viena(Austria),2001:6-7．
[5]MUDD G M.Critical review of acid in situ leach uranium mining:1.USA and Australia[J].Environmental Geology,2001,41(3/4):390-403．
[6]MUDD G M.Critical review of acid in situ leach uranium mining:2.Soviet Block and Asia[J].Environmental Geology,2001,41(3/4):404-416．
[7]SAUNDERS J A,PIVETZ B E,VOORHIES N,et al.Potential aquifer vulnerability in regions down-gradient from uranium in situ recovery (ISR)sites[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2016,183:67-83．
[8]BORCH T,ROCHE N,JOHNSON T E.Determination of contaminant levels and remediation efficacy in groundwater at a former in situ recovery uranium mine[J].Journal of Environmental Monitoring,2012,14(7):1814-1823．
[9]WOLDEGABRIEL G,BOUKHALFA H,WARE S D,et al.Characterization of cores from an in-situ recovery mined uranium deposit in Wyoming:Implications for post-mining restoration[J].Chemical Geology,2014,390:32-45．
[10]史维浚,程军蕊,王国华．地浸场地残余溶液对水环境影响中的水文地球化学问题讨论[J]．东华理工学院学报,2004(2):101-111.SHI W J,CHENG J R,WANG G H.Prob on assessment of water environment of in-situ leaching site from points of hydrogeochemistry[J].Journal of East China University of Technology,2004 (2):101-111．
[11]郝毅,刘金辉,周义朋．新疆某砂岩型铀矿地浸对采区外围地下水的影响[J]．有色金属工程,2013,3(5):50-52.HAO Y,LIU J H,ZHOU Y P.The influence of in-situ leaching of a sandstone uranium deposits on the groundwater around the mining area in Xinjiang[J].Nonferrous Metals Engineering,2013,3(5):50-52．
[12]左维,谭凯旋．新疆某地浸采铀矿山退役井场地下水污染特征[J]．南华大学学报(自然科学版),2014,28(4):28-34.ZUO W,TAN K X.The characteristics of groundwater contamination of a decommissioned wellfield in some in-situ leaching uranium mine,Xinjiang,China[J].Journal of University of South China,2014,28(4):28-34．
[13]张春艳,莫子奋,柳哲权,等．某铀尾矿库周边地下水重金属污染特征及健康风险研究[J]．有色金属(冶炼部分),2019(7):73-77.ZHANG C Y,MO Z F,LIU Z Q,et al.Pollution characteristics and risk assessment of health risk from heavy metals in groundwater around uranium tailing pond[J].Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy),2019(7):73-77．
[14]魏强林,陈功新,曾华,等．某铀尾矿库周边地表水中铀和钾分布特征与评价[J]．有色金属(冶炼部分),2019(8):85-89.WEI Q L,CHEN G X,ZENG H,et al.Distribution and evaluation of nuclide uranium and potassium in surface water around uranium tailings[J].Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy),2019(8):85-89．
[15]周巾枚,蒋忠诚,徐光黎,等．崇左响水地区地下水水质分析及健康风险评价[J]．环境科学,2019,40(6):2675-2685.ZHOU J M,JIANG Z C,XU G L,et al.Water quality analysis and health risk assessment for groundwater at Xiangshui,Chongzuo[J].Environmental Science,2019,40(6):2675-2685．
[16]MOSES C O,NORDSTROM D K,HERMAN J S,et al.Aqueous pyrite oxidation by dissolved oxygen and by ferric iron[J].Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta,1987,51(6):1561-1571．
[17]SCHARER J M,NICHOLSON R V,HALBERT B,et al.A computer program to assess acid generation in pyritic tailings[J].ACS Symposium Series,1993:132-152.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X523
引用信息:
[1]何成垚,谭凯旋,李咏梅,等.新疆某铀矿酸法和CO_2地浸采区地下水的污染特征及机理[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2021(06):53-59.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1703123)
2021-06-11
2021-06-11