nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 08, 152-164
铜侧吹熔炼工艺参数正交仿真试验与显著性分析
基金项目(Foundation): 江西省大学生创新创业项目(S202210407006); 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52364047); 江西省科技厅自然科学基金资助项目(20212BAB204026); 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2019M662268); 江西省博士后择优资助项目(2018KY15)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.20237/j.issn.1007-7545.2025.08.015
投稿时间: 2025-03-31
投稿日期(年): 2025
修回时间: 2025-05-21
终审时间: 2025-05-22
终审日期(年): 2025
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2025-08-08
出版时间: 2025-08-08
移动端阅读
摘要:

针对铜侧吹熔炼工艺参数优化控制难题,基于MetCal软件平台,利用已开发的铜侧吹熔炼多相平衡热力学数学模型和仿真系统,采用L49(78)正交试验设计,系统探究了氧料比、燃煤率、熔剂配比等7个关键工艺参数对熔炼过程的影响规律。通过方差分析(SPSS)结合效应量评估,揭示了各参数对铜锍品位、渣相组分及烟气成分的显著性作用机制。结果表明:氧料比和燃煤率对铜锍品位、渣含铜等6项指标具有全局性显著影响;石英熔剂率通过调节硅酸度显著改变渣中Fe_3O4含量和铁硅比;富氧浓度与烟气SO2浓度呈强正相关,而熔炼温度和烟灰率对工艺指标无统计学显著影响。在此基础上,采用热力学模型进一步探讨了Cu-Fe-S-O-Si-Ca多元体系的相平衡机制。本研究建立的参数显著性分级结果为铜侧吹熔炼工艺优化提供了理论依据,该方法可推广至复杂冶金系统的多目标优化研究。

Abstract:

The copper side-blown smelting process faces persistent challenges in industrial optimization due to the complex coupling mechanisms among multiple operational parameters and insufficient theoretical understanding of their synergistic effects. To systematically address these limitations, this study develops an integrated computationalexperimental framework combining multi-phase equilibrium thermodynamics with advanced statistical analysis. Using the MetCal numerical simulation platform as the foundational tool, a comprehensive thermodynamic model for the Cu-Fe-S-O-Si-Ca six-component system was established, explicitly accounting for phase equilibria interactions between matte, slag, and gaseous phases under dynamic smelting conditions. A mixed-level orthogonal experimental design(L49(78) matrix) was implemented to decouple the intertwined effects of seven critical parameters: oxygento-feed ratio, coal consumption rate, quartz flux rate, smelting temperature, oxygen enrichment level, ash content, and iron-to-silicon ratio. This design strategy enables efficient exploration of experimental combinations while maintaining statistical validity through balanced factor-level distribution. Process responses were quantified through six key performance indicators: copper matte grade, copper loss in slag, Fe_3O4 content in slag, operational iron-tosilicon ratio, slag viscosity, and flue gas SO2 concentration. Three-factor analysis of variance(ANOVA) performed through SPSS 26.0 quantitatively assesses parameter contributions to six critical process indicators: matte grade, copper content in slag, Fe_3O4 content, operational iron-to-silicon ratio, slag viscosity, and flue gas SO2 concentration. The ANOVA results demonstrate that oxygen-to-feed ratio and coal consumption rate exhibit statistically significant impacts(p<0.01) on global performance metrics including matte grade and copper loss in slag. Quartz flux rate primarily regulates magnetite content and iron-to-silicon ratio through silicate degree modulation. Oxygen enrichment concentration shows strong positive correlation with flue gas SO2 levels. Notably, smelting temperature and ash content display no statistically significant influences(p>0.05), suggesting potential overspecification in current temperature control practices. Complementary thermodynamic modeling further elucidates parameter effects on product phase composition. The elevation of oxygen potential facilitates the preferential oxidation of FeS, thereby promoting matte enrichment in copper smelting. The quartz flux rate demonstrates a significant reduction effect on Fe_3O4 content within slag through adjustment of the SiO2/Fe ratio, with a notable reduction amplitude reaching 30%. Conversely, the lime flux rate induces a linear increase in CaO concentration within slag, elevating from 3% to 14%. Regarding oxygen enrichment, each 10% increment in concentration correlates with an average 3% enhancement of SO2 concentration in flue gas. However, stringent control of coal rate is imperative to suppress CO2 generation, as exceeding 5% coal rate results in CO2 proportion surpassing 18% in flue gas composition. The developed parameter significance classification model provides theoretical guidance for optimizing copper side-blown smelting processes, while the methodology demonstrates generalizability for multi-objective optimization in complex metallurgical systems. This integrated approach effectively bridges the knowledge gap between multi-parameter interactions and process outcomes, offering a systematic framework for data-driven decision-making in industrial smelting operations.

参考文献

[1]李文彬.铜闪速熔炼三年长周期生产实践[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2022(3):60-64.LI W B. Practice of three years long cycle copper flash smelting[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy),2022(3):60-64.

[2]董广刚,葛哲令,曾庆晔.闪速炼铜技术的自主创新与发展[J].铜业工程, 2015(6):31-35.DONG G G, GE Z L, ZENG Q Y. The development and selfinnovation of flash copper smelting technology[J]. Copper Engineering, 2015(6):31-35.

[3]贾文清.铜火法冶炼熔池熔炼工艺比较[J].山西冶金, 2020,43(3):82-83.JIA W Q. Comparison of smelting process in copper smelting bath[J]. Shanxi Metallurgy, 2020, 43(3):82-83.

[4]朱祖泽,贺家齐.现代铜冶金学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.ZHU Z Z, HE J Q. Modern copper metallurgy[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2003.

[5]杨晋国.瓦纽科夫熔池熔炼技术综述[J].新疆有色金属,2009, 32(4):42-44.YANG J G. Review of Vanukov melting pool smelting technology[J]. Xinjiang Nonferrous Metals, 2009, 32(4):42-44.

[6]衷水平,陈杭,林泓富,等.我国铜熔炼工艺简析[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2017(11):1-8.ZHONG S P, CHEN H, LIN H F, et al. Brief analysis on copper smelting process in China[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2017(11):1-8.

[7]陈晓军.我国铜冶炼技术的进步及发展[J].世界有色金属,2021(14):15-16.CHEN X J. Progress and development of copper smelting technology in China[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2021(14):15-16.

[8]冯亚平,李相良,尹一男,等.双侧吹熔池熔炼渣型试验研究[J].中国资源综合利用, 2015, 33(4):24-27.FENG Y P, LI X L, YIN Y N, et al. Study on the slag type of double sides blowing bath smelting process[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2015, 33(4):24-27.

[9]罗银华,王志超.富邦富氧侧吹熔池炼铜炉生产实践[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2013(7):19-22.LUO Y H, WANG Z C. Plant practice of Fubang oxygenenriched side-blown bath smelting copper furnace[J].Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2013(7):19-22.

[10]简锡明,张晓丹.侧吹炉技术优化操作实践[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2017(11):9-13.JIAN X M, ZHANG X D. Optimization operation practice of side blown furnace[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2017(11):9-13.

[11]葛晓鸣,王举良.铜富氧侧吹熔池熔炼的生产实践[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2011(8):13-16.GE X M, WANG J L. Plant practice of copper oxygen enrichment side-blowing bath smelting process[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2011(8):13-16.

[12]孙林权,王举良.富氧侧吹熔池熔炼炉炼铜的生产实践[J].中国有色冶金, 2011, 40(4):15-18.SUN L Q, WANG J L. Production practice of copper smelting in oxygen-enriched side-blown bath smelting furnace[J]. China Nonferrous Metallurgy, 2011, 40(4):15-18.

[13]王志超,李东泽,李国军.富邦富氧侧吹炼铜炉二次风改造生产实践[J].有色矿冶, 2014(4):40-42.WANG Z C, LI D Z, LI G J. Reformation and production practice for secondary air of Fubang oxygen-enriched side blown copper melting furnace[J]. Non-Ferrous Mining and Metallurgy, 2014(4):40-42.

[14]冯亚平,章俊,李小龙,等.高效铜侧吹熔炼反应器内均混时间的物理模拟[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2015(6):1-3.FENG Y P, ZHANG J, LI X L, et al. Physical simulation on mixing time in high efficient copper side-blown smelting reactor[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy),2015(6):1-3.

[15]ZHU S, ZHAO Q Y, LI X L, et al. Flow and penetration behavior of sub-merged side-blown gas[J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2023, 30(6):1067-1077.

[16]ZHANG H L, ZHOU C Q, WU B, et al. Numerical simulation of multiphase flow in a Vanyukov furnace[J]. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2015,115(5):457-463.

[17]LIU Y T, YANG T Z, CHEN Z, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of two-phase flow in oxygen enriched side-blown furnace[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2020, 30(1):249-258.

[18]邵品.冶金熔体内气泡行为的数值模拟研究[D].沈阳:东北大学, 2015.SHAO P. Numerical and physics simulation of bubble behavior in metallurgical melt[D]. Shenyang:Northeastern University,2015.

[19]刘泛函.瓦钮科夫炉熔池侧吹强化搅拌过程数值模拟及混合效果评价方法研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学, 2016.LIU F H. Numerical simulation and evaluation method of mixing enhancement in the side-blown bath of a Vanyukov furnace[D]. Kunming:Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2016.

[20]WALTER D, GONZALO R, CARLOS T, et al. Radiometric temperature measurement of copper concentrates in flash smelting conditions simulated at laboratory scale coupled with a macroscopic chemical reaction model and automated mineralogical characterization[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2022, 53(6):3967-3978.

[21]汪飞虎,龙鹏.铜闪速熔炼精矿喷嘴性能的数值仿真分析[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2019(12):11-16.WANG F H, LONG P. Performance analysis of concentrate jet of copper flash smelting furnace based on numerical simulation[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy),2019(12):11-16.

[22]李俊标,谢剑才,王凤阳.高强度铜闪速熔炼过程颗粒行为仿真研究[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2015(9):35-38.LI J B, XIE J C, WANG F Y. Particle behavior simulation during high strength copper flash smelting process[J].Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2015(9):35-38.

[23]李明周,童长仁,汪金良,等.基于Rand-MQC耦合算法的高强度铜闪速熔炼多相平衡热力学分析[J].有色金属(冶炼部分), 2017(2):4-9, 14.LI M Z, TONG C R, WANG J L, et al. Multiphase equilibrium thermodynamics analysis of high strength copper flash smelting based on coupled algorithm of Rand-MQC[J].Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2017(2):4-9, 14.

[24]郭学益,姜保成,王亲猛,等.氧气底吹炼铜模拟仿真研究进展[J].有色金属科学与工程, 2022, 13(3):9-19.GUO X Y, JIANG B C, WANG Q M, et al. Research progress in the simulation of oxygen bottom-blowing copper smelting[J]. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering,2022, 13(3):9-19.

[25]汪金良,周瑞,刘远,等.基于MetCal的双底吹连续炼铜工艺全流程模拟计算[J].有色金属科学与工程, 2021, 12(3):1-11.WANG J L, ZHOU R, LIU Y, et al. Simulation calculation of overall process of double bottom blowing continuous copper smelting process based on MetCal[J]. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering, 2021, 12(3):1-11.

[26]CHEN X, LI M, LIU F, et al. Multi-Phase equilibrium model of oxygen-enriched lead oxidation smelting process based on chemical equilibrium constant method[J]. Processes, 2023,11(10):3043. DOI:10.3390/PR11103043.

[27]杨少华,杨亮,陈功,等.北京:现代冶金实验研究方法[M].北京:冶金工业出版社, 2021.YANG S H, YANG L, CHEN G, et al. Modern metallurgical experimental research methods[M]. Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press, 2021.

[28]徐少春,李明周,赵志慧,等.基于MetCal的铜阳极炉精炼过程热力学仿真分析[J].中国有色金属学报, 2024, 34(9):3141-3155.XU S C, LI M Z, ZHAO Z H, et al. Thermodynamic simulation analysis of copper anode furnace refining process based on MetCal software[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2024, 34(9):3141-3155.

[29]徐少春,李明周,赵志慧,等.基于MetCal的铜阳极炉精炼过程热力学仿真模型[J].中国有色金属学报, 2024, 34(7):2436-2451.XU S H, LI M Z, ZHAO Z H, et al. Thermodynamic simulation modeling of copper anode furnace refining process based on MetCal software[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2024, 34(7):2436-2451.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20237/j.issn.1007-7545.2025.08.015

中图分类号:TF811

引用信息:

[1]祁燈锐,黄义鹏,李明周.铜侧吹熔炼工艺参数正交仿真试验与显著性分析[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2025(08):152-164.DOI:10.20237/j.issn.1007-7545.2025.08.015.

基金信息:

江西省大学生创新创业项目(S202210407006); 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52364047); 江西省科技厅自然科学基金资助项目(20212BAB204026); 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2019M662268); 江西省博士后择优资助项目(2018KY15)

投稿时间:

2025-03-31

投稿日期(年):

2025

修回时间:

2025-05-21

终审时间:

2025-05-22

终审日期(年):

2025

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2025-08-08

出版时间:

2025-08-08

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文