| 453 | 15 | 41 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在酸法地浸采铀过程中,铀在溶解—沉淀—再溶解的过程中会生成石膏堵塞空隙,导致孔隙度及铀浸出迁移的变化。为探明酸法浸铀过程中因石膏沉淀堵塞产生的变化,以某实际地浸采铀过程为例,通过模型概化构建孔隙度变化下的不同模型进行对比分析。结果表明:1)模拟过程结束后(600d),整个模型孔隙度均发生不同程度的变化,在注液孔2与注液孔5所在截面内,0m处孔隙度增幅最大,增大了3.66%,8m处孔隙度降幅最大,减少了1.66%。2)铀矿的浸出速率与该处孔隙度呈正相关,t=8d时,0m处生产模型孔隙度达到最大,理想模型与生产模型在该处的铀矿剩余量差值也达到最大,理想模型沥青铀矿剩余量为54.84%,生产模型沥青铀矿剩余量为54.74%。t>8d时,0m处生产模型孔隙度开始减小,铀矿浸出速率下降,t=18d时,理想模型与生产模型铀矿剩余量相等。3)孔隙度减少的矿层直接影响到溶浸液在其中的迁移,降低了铀浸出迁移的效果。t=600d时,8m处生产模型孔隙度达到最小值,溶浸液运移阻碍影响达到最大时,理想模型与生产模型中10m处沥青铀矿剩余量差值也达到最大,理想模型为9.65%,生产模型为13.34%。
Abstract：In process of uranium extraction by acid leaching,gypsum will be formed during dissolution,precipitation and redissolution of uranium,which will lead to change of porosity and uranium leaching migration.Taking an actual uranium leaching process as an example,a comparative analysis of different models under porosity change by model generalization was constructed to explore these changes.The results show that:1)After simulation process(600 days),porosity of the whole model changes to different degrees.Within cross sections of pore 2 and pore 5,porosity at 0 mrises the most with an increase of3.66%,and that at 8 mdrops the most with a drop of 1.66%.2)Leaching rate of uranium ore positively correlates with porosity of the site.When t=8 d,the porosity of production model at 0 mreaches the maximum,and the difference between uranium residue of ideal model and production model also reaches the maximum.Uranium residue of ideal model and production model is 54.84%and 54.74%respectively.At t>8 d,porosity and uranium leaching rate of production model at 0 m begin to drop.At t=18 d,uranium surplus of ideal model and production model is equal.3)Ore bed with reduced porosity directly affects migration of leaching solution in it,reducing effect of uranium leaching migration.When t=600 d,porosity of production model at 8 m reaches the minimum value,and influence of leaching solution migration obstacle reaches the maximum.Difference of pitchblende residue between ideal model and production model at 10 malso reaches the maximum value,the ideal model is 9.65%,and the production model is 13.34%.
[1]王建强，戴志敏，徐洪杰．核能综合利用研究现状与展望[J]．中国科学院院刊，2019,34(4):460-468.WANG J Q,DAI Z M,XU H J.Research status and prospect of comprehensive utilization of nuclear energy[J].Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2019,34(4):460-468.
[2]李孝君，地浸采铀方法研究及展望[J]．绿色科技，2018(6):54-56.LI X J.Present situation and prospect of in-situ leaching uranium mining[J].Journal of Green Science and Technology,2018(6):54-56.
[3]原渊，苏学斌，李建华，等．世界地浸采铀矿山生产现状与进展[J]．中国矿业，2018,27（增刊1):59-61,74.YUAN Y,SU X B,LI J H,et al.Production status and development of the world in-situ leaching of uranium mines[J].China Mining Magazine,2018,27(S1):59-61,74.
[4]胡鹏华，李先杰，陈刚，等．中国地浸采铀安全环保现状与展望[J]．铀矿冶，2019,38(1):70-74.HU P H,LI X J,CHEN G,et al.Present situation and development of ISL radiation protection and regulation in China[J].Uranium Mining and Metallurgy,2019,38(1):70-74.
[5]王铁利．渗透率与孔隙度、束缚水、饱和度的关系[J]．煤炭技术，2010,29(1):172-173.WANG T L.Relationship of permeability with porosity,bound water and saturation[J].Goal Technology,2010,29(1):172-173.
[6]陈梅芳，花明，阳奕汉，等．酸法地浸采铀浸出剂的减量化控制与应用[J]．中国矿业，2019,28(3):124-128.CHEN M F,HUA M,YANG Y H,et al.Reduction control and it’s application of leaching agent for acid leaching in-situ leaching uranium mine[J].China Mining Magazine,2019,28(3):124-128.
[7]陈万利．巴彦乌拉铀矿地浸过程中含矿层化学堵塞机理研究[D]．南昌：东华理工大学，2017.CHEN W L.Study on the chemical jamming mechanism of in-situ leaching process in ledge of Bayan Ula uranium ore deposit[D].Nanchang:East China University of Technology,2017.
[8]焦学然，张霞，孙占学．混合淡化解决铀矿床地浸开采堵塞问题研究[J]．矿业研究与开发，2014,34(7):5-8.JIAO X R,ZHANG X,SUN Z X.Sedimentation jamming control in the in-situ leaching of uranium by mixing and desalting method[J].Mining Research and Development,2014,34(7):5-8.
[9]宗绪永，李柏军．提高低渗透铀矿床地浸采铀钻孔涌水量的成井工艺研究[J]．地质装备，2014,15(3):35-37.ZONG X Y,LI B J.Study on improving borehole water inflow at low-permeable uranium deposits[J].Equipment for Geotechnical Engineering,2014,15(3):35-37.
[10]赵海军．某低渗透性铀矿床改善含矿层渗透性方法研究[C]//中国核学会．中国核科学技术进展报告（第三卷）—中国核学会2013年学术年会论文集第2册（铀矿冶分卷、核能动力分卷（上））．北京：中国原子能出版社，2013:237-241.ZHAO H J.Study on improving the permeability of ore bearing bed in a low permeability uranium deposit[C]//Chinese Nuclear Society.Progress report on China's nuclear science and technology(VolumeⅢ）：Proceedings of 2013 Annual Meeting of Chinese Nuclear Society Volume 2(Uranium Mining and Metallurgy and Nuclear Power Volume（Ⅰ））．Beijing:China Atomic Energy Press,2013:237-241.
[11]高柏，邢拥国，张文，等．淡化地下水对缓解某矿床地浸化学堵塞的探讨[J]．铀矿冶，2010,29(2):61-65.GAO B,XING Y G,ZHANG W,et al.The effect of diluting groundwater on chemical sedimentation in alkaline in-situ leaching of a uranium deposit of Xinjiang[J].Uranium Mining and Metallurgy,2010,29(2):61-65.
[12]ROTTING T S,LUQUOT L,CARRERA J,et al.Changes in porosity,permeability,water retention curve and reactive surface area during carbonate rock dissolution[J].Chemical Geology,2015,403:86-98.
[13]CRANDELL L E,PETERS C A,UM W,et al.Changes in the pore network structure of Hanford sediment after reaction with caustic tank wastes[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2012,131(1/2/3/4):89-99.
[14]NOIRIEL C,LUQUOT L,MADE B,et al.Changes in reactive surface area during limestone dissolution:An experimental and modelling study[J].Chemical Geology,2009,265(1/2):160-170.
[15]薛禹群，吴吉春．地下水动力学[M].3版．北京：地质出版社，2010:31-33.XUE Y Q,WU J C.Groundwater Dynamics[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2010:31-33.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TL212.12
引用信息:
[1]汪润超,李寻,罗跃,等.酸法地浸采铀中孔隙度及铀浸出迁移的时空演化[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2021(01):42-47.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(42062017,41761090,11465002,41201500);国家自然科学基金核技术创新联合基金资助项目(U1967209); 江西省教育厅基金项目(2017ACB20021);江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ180380); 江西省自然科学基金资助项目(2012BAB206001); 核资源与环境重点实验室(东华理工大学)开放基金项目(NRE1612)
2021-01-12
2021-01-12